Photo Source: © International Service for Human Rights
Photo Source: © International Service for Human Rights

Joint Statement at NGO Committee consultation with ECOSOC accredited NGOs

13 December 2022

This is a group statement. We welcome the convening of this important meeting, mandated by paragraph 61(a) of ECOSOC resolution 1996/31. However, we deeply regret that this is only the second meeting since 1996 and urge Committee members to fulfil this mandate and organise consultations with accredited NGOs prior to each Committee session.

Resolution 1996/31 acknowledges the breadth of NGOs’ expertise, their capacity to support the UN’s work, and the need to consider the full diversity of NGOs at all levels. The Committee on NGOs is the gatekeeper to civil society access, and entrusted with monitoring the relationship between NGOs and the UN. Yet, the Committee’s practices violate its mandate.

Several Committee members ask repetitive and politically motivated questions to defer applications for consultative status for several years outside the scope of what NGOs are required to submit in their applications under ECOSOC resolution 1996/31. These arbitrary deferrals amount to de facto rejections – and affect NGOs working on human rights, democracy and the rule of law in particular. This is a form of reprisals against NGOs for attempting to engage with and contribute to the UN’s work.

We urge the Committee to:

      • Ensure applications for ECOSOC accreditation are considered in a fair and expeditious manner; and
      • Allow applicants to participate in the Q&A sessions remotely via videoconferencing, providing the opportunity for immediate responses to questions and speeding up the process of accreditation.

Beyond accreditation, genuine NGO participation must be enabled free from the fear of reprisals. We urge the institutionalisation of hybrid modalities across the UN to enable inclusive and effective participation and to overcome barriers such as visa denials, resource challenges, and accessibility for people with disabilities.

ECOSOC and the Committee on NGOs are legally obliged to exercise their functions consistent with international human rights standards on the rights to due process, non-discrimination, and fundamental freedoms of expression, association and assembly. The depth of global challenges necessitates that NGOs working to promote the UN’s work must be welcomed as partners, and not blocked due to arbitrary and political reasons.


  1. Al-Haq, Law in the Service of Man
  2. Amnesty International
  3. Association for Progressive Communications – APC
  4. Center for Reproductive Rights
  6. Conectas Direitos Humanos
  7. CREA
  8. DefendDefenders (East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project)
  10. Global Justice Center
  11. Human Rights in China (HRIC)
  12. Human Rights Watch
  13. ICNL
  14. IFEX
  15. International Commission of Jurists
  16. International Service for Human Rights
  17. MENA Rights Group
  18. Outright International
  19. Realizing Sexual and Reproductive Justice (RESURJ)
  20. SCM- Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression
  21. Southern Africa Human Rights Defenders Network (SAWHRDN)
  22. Southern Africa Human Rights Defenders Network (SouthernDefenders)
  23. The Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect
  24. The Global Network of Sex Work Projects (NSWP)
  25. Urgent Action Fund for Women’s Human Rights
Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect and other NGOs


Sign up for our newsletter and stay up to date on R2P news and alerts

Follow us on social media


Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect

Ralph Bunche Institute for International Studies
The Graduate Center, CUNY
365 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5203
New York, NY 10016-4309, USA

Phone: +1 212-817-1929 |
R2P Resources & Statements